How to Anticipate and Manage Variability in Industrial Production: In Brief
Industrial variability represents one of the major challenges faced by Quebec manufacturing companies. Whether it arises from raw materials, equipment, operators, or the environment, it directly impacts quality control, productivity, and production costs. Studies show that unmanaged variability can lead to losses ranging from 5% to 15% of revenue. Common symptoms include:
- Quality discrepancies between production batches
- Instability in process parameters (uncontrolled variations in machine settings, temperatures, pressures, and other critical manufacturing variables)
- Unexplained variations in control measurements
- Recurring non-conformities
- Frequent equipment adjustments
Sources of Variability in an Industrial Environment
Variability of Raw Materials
Incoming materials are the primary source of variation in the manufacturing process. In the plastics industry, a 2% variation in resin viscosity leads to up to 8% waste. Changes in batches, differences in chemical composition, and dimensional discrepancies generate hidden costs estimated between 2% and 5% of raw material costs. Monitoring the homogeneity of batches, granulation, viscosity, density, and moisture content is crucial.
Variability of Equipment
Machines undergo natural wear that impacts their precision. In Quebec's metallurgical industry, tool precision diminishes by an average of 0.01mm every 100 hours of use. This variability stems from multiple factors:
- Progressive mechanical wear
- Vibrations and resonances
- Thermal deformation
- Misalignment of components
- Increasing mechanical play
- Electromagnetic disturbances
Environmental Factors
The production environment significantly influences processes:
- Temperature: a 5°C variation alters the dimensions of metal parts by 0.05%
- Humidity: in the paper industry, dimensional variations can reach 2%
- External vibrations: affect equipment precision by 0.1%
- Air quality: critical in the pharmaceutical industry
- Seasonal variations: modify material characteristics by 1% to 3%
Preventive Approach and Acceptable Control Zone
Defining Control Limits
The acceptable control zone (ACZ) defines the range of variation tolerated for each critical parameter. It is established based on:
- Customer specifications
- Process capabilities
- Applicable ISO standards
- Production history
- Economic constraints
To be effective, the ACZ must be:
- Measurable with precision
- Realistic and achievable
- Documented and communicated
- Regularly reevaluated
MES Systems and Statistical Control
Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) allow real-time monitoring of critical parameters. The implementation of these systems in the aerospace industry consistently shows significant reductions in process variability. Key features include:
- Automatic data collection from processes
- Calculation of statistical indicators (Cp, Cpk)
- Early warning alerts
- Complete batch traceability
- Trend analysis
Compliance with ISO Standards
ISO 9001:2015 and IATF 16949 standards require a structured approach to variability management. Key points include:
- Mapping of critical processes
- Identification of key parameters
- Documented monitoring plan
- Validated measurement methods
- Documented corrective actions
Anticipation Strategies and Best Practices
Predictive Monitoring
Trend analysis enables the anticipation of deviations before they impact quality:
- Monitoring control charts
- Analyzing recurring patterns
- Correlating between parameters
- Statistical modeling
- Anomaly detection
Application of Artificial Intelligence
Predictive Analysis:
Machine learning algorithms identify complex patterns in process data to:
- Detect micro-variations
- Predict quality deviations
- Optimize parameters
- Significantly reduce scrap rates
Multivariate Optimization:
AI allows the simultaneous optimization of multiple parameters to:
- Maximize quality
- Minimize material consumption
- Reduce energy consumption
- Optimize cycle times
The Hidden Costs of Variability
Direct Financial Impacts
Unmanaged variability results in significant costs:
- Scrap and rework: 3-8% of production cost
- Material overconsumption: 2-5% of purchases
- Machine downtime: 5-15% of available time
- Additional controls: 1-3% of operational costs
Indirect Costs
Indirect impacts are often underestimated:
- Excess buffer stocks
- Loss of customer trust
- Demotivation of teams
- Complexity of processes
- Systematic overqualification
Conclusion
Mastering industrial variability is a significant challenge, with potential financial impacts reaching 15% of revenue. A structured approach combining:
- Clearly defined control limits
- Efficient MES systems
- Compliance with ISO standards
- Use of artificial intelligence
can reduce variability by an average of 30% to 50% over 12 months. Companies excelling in this area gain lasting competitive advantages, with non-quality costs below 2% and customer satisfaction exceeding 95%.
.jpg)