.jpg)
The Andon system is a crucial quality control tool from the Toyota Production System that allows operators to quickly alert in case of problems on a production line. Originating in Japan, this visual device (often in the form of illuminated boards or emergency cords) empowers employees to stop production when they detect a defect, thus promoting immediate problem-solving and continuous process improvement. In modern industry, Andon systems have evolved into digital solutions while maintaining their fundamental principle: identifying and resolving problems at the source before they escalate.
The word "Andon" comes from Japanese and originally referred to a traditional paper lamp. In the industrial context, this term was adopted by Toyota in the 1960s as a central element of its production system. You've probably already noticed that many Lean Manufacturing concepts have Japanese names - the Andon system follows this same tradition.
What distinguishes Andon is that it embodies the Japanese philosophy of "Jidoka," one of the two pillars of the Toyota Production System along with "Just-in-Time." Jidoka can be roughly translated as "automation with a human touch" or "autonomation." It involves designing processes so that they automatically stop when a problem occurs, allowing immediate human intervention in the spirit of Kaizen, continuous improvement.
In its simplest form, a traditional Andon system consists of visual signals that alert everyone in the factory that a problem exists. You might wonder how this works in practice? Imagine an automotive assembly line where each station is equipped with a cord or button. When an operator detects a defect or problem that cannot be resolved within the normal cycle time, they pull this cord.
Triggering an Andon alert typically follows a structured process. When an operator identifies a problem they cannot immediately resolve, they activate the Andon signal. This action is deliberate and empowering - it reflects the Gemba philosophy (where the real value is found) which values the expertise of people working directly in the field. The alert can be triggered for various reasons: quality issues, lack of parts, equipment malfunction, or even to signal a safety risk.
This action immediately activates a colored light signal on an Andon board visible to all, often accompanied by an audible signal. Colors typically follow a standard code:
This visual standardization fits perfectly into the 5S principles (Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, Shitsuke) which advocate for the visual organization of the work environment to facilitate rapid detection of anomalies.
The supervisor or technical support team then responds to the alert according to a clearly defined protocol. This protocol precisely establishes who should intervene, within what timeframe, and according to what procedure. If the problem cannot be resolved quickly, the decision may be made to completely stop the line until a solution is found. This "stop and fix" philosophy is fundamental - it prioritizes quality over short-term production quantity.
Rapid and structured intervention transforms each incident into an opportunity to apply Poka-Yoke (mistake-proofing) mechanisms to prevent the recurrence of the problem, thereby strengthening the overall efficiency of the production system.
Implementing an Andon system brings many tangible benefits for manufacturing companies. The most obvious is quality improvement. By detecting and correcting problems as soon as they appear, many defective parts that would have required costly rework or worse, could have reached the customer, are avoided.
On the human side, Andon empowers production operators by giving them a concrete tool to act when they observe a problem. This autonomy is fundamental for team engagement and morale improvement. Workers are no longer mere executors but become key actors in quality.
In terms of productivity, although line stoppage may seem counterproductive at first glance, it actually generates substantial long-term gains. Recurring problems are identified and permanently eliminated, which progressively reduces downtime and increases Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), a key indicator in any Lean Manufacturing approach.
With the advent of Industry 4.0, Andon systems have evolved considerably. Traditional light boards are now supplemented or replaced by digital interfaces. You've probably already noticed in modern factories the presence of touch screens and digital dashboards that display the status of production lines in real-time.
Digital Andon solutions use various technologies such as IoT (Internet of Things) to connect machines and workstations. Smart sensors can automatically detect certain anomalies and trigger alerts without human intervention. These systems rely on secure cloud platforms that centralize data and allow access from anywhere, facilitating remote monitoring of production lines.
Integration with MES (Manufacturing Execution System) allows for in-depth contextualization of Andon alerts. When a signal is triggered, the system can automatically associate relevant information such as the reference of the product being manufactured, machine parameters, or recent equipment maintenance history.
Integration with other systems such as CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System) or ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) also allows for smoother coordination between different departments during incident resolution.
The advantages of digital Andon are numerous. First, automatic data collection allows for in-depth analysis of incidents: frequency, duration, recurring causes. This information directly feeds continuous improvement processes. Second, notification can be extended beyond the workshop - alerts can be sent instantly by SMS or email to concerned individuals, even if they are not physically present.
Implementing an Andon system goes well beyond installing equipment or software. The success of such a system primarily rests on solid cultural foundations. Management must demonstrate a clear commitment to quality and value problem identification rather than hiding issues.
Operator training is crucial: they must understand when and why to use the system, and be convinced that no reprimand will follow stopping a line. This requires a paradigm shift in many organizations where pressure to maintain production can sometimes outweigh quality considerations.
Another essential aspect concerns standardizing responses to alerts. Who should intervene? Within what timeframe? What are the resolution steps? These elements must be clearly defined and documented in procedures accessible to all.
Despite its many benefits, implementing an Andon system can face various obstacles. The most common is cultural resistance: in environments where production continuity is extremely valued, operators may hesitate to use the system for fear of repercussions or judgment.
Another challenge concerns responsiveness to alerts. An Andon system that triggers alerts to which no one responds quickly quickly loses all credibility. It is essential to have adequate resources to handle each signal and resolve identified problems.
Alert overload also represents a risk. An overly sensitive system that constantly generates notifications can lead to "alert fatigue," where signals end up being ignored or underestimated. Calibration of triggers and prioritization of alerts are therefore critical aspects to consider.
Effectively managing an Andon system requires a mix of technical and managerial skills. On the technical side, a basic understanding of control systems and interfaces is necessary, particularly for digital solutions. For more sophisticated systems, knowledge in data analysis can be useful for exploiting the collected information. On the managerial side, essential skills include the ability to train and motivate teams, strong problem-solving aptitudes, and a good understanding of Lean Manufacturing principles. The person responsible must also be able to facilitate interdepartmental communication, as resolving reported problems often involves multiple departments.
Results of an Andon system typically appear in several phases. In the first weeks following implementation, you will probably notice an increase in stoppages and interventions, which may seem counterproductive but actually represents the detection of previously ignored problems. The first tangible benefits such as defect reduction and quality improvement generally begin to manifest after 1 to 3 months of consistent use. Significant productivity gains and cost reduction are typically observable after 6 to 12 months, once the team has fully adopted the system and recurring problems have been systematically eliminated. The full impact, including improved corporate culture and employee empowerment, can take up to 18 months to fully materialize.
From traditional pull cords to sophisticated digital solutions, the essence of the Andon system remains unchanged: identifying problems at the source, responding to them immediately, and transforming each incident into an opportunity for improvement.
Would you like to discover more about our Andon solution? Click here to learn more.
Sign up to follow manufacturing news.