.jpg)
Today, precise performance measurement has become not a luxury, but an absolute necessity. You've probably already noticed that the most successful companies are those that master their industrial key performance indicators (KPIs). Among the multitude of metrics available for measuring industrial production, some stand out for their ability to provide a comprehensive and actionable view of productive efficiency. OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness), also known as TRS (Taux de Rendement Synthétique) in French, positions itself as the king of manufacturing performance indicators, capable on its own of revealing the true health status of your production. Accompanied by four other strategic KPIs essential to any production dashboard, it constitutes the indispensable arsenal for any production manager wishing to excel in an increasingly competitive industrial environment.
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) undoubtedly represents the most comprehensive and revealing KPI in an industrial environment. This three-dimensional metric combines three essential factors: equipment availability, performance, and product quality. Its formula, makes it a particularly powerful indicator that may seem simple on the surface but has unmatched depth of analysis.
You may wonder how a single indicator can capture so many different aspects of your production. It is precisely this ability to integrate the three fundamental dimensions of performance that makes OEE an invaluable tool. When your OEE displays 85%, it means you are producing at 85% of your theoretical maximum capacity – crucial information for identifying your margin for improvement.
To effectively calculate your OEE, it is necessary to understand each of its components. Availability measures the ratio between actual operating time and planned operating time of your equipment. It takes into account both scheduled and unscheduled stoppages. Performance compares the actual production rate to the theoretical rate. Finally, the quality rate represents the proportion of conforming products relative to the total products manufactured.
Let's take a concrete example: if your production line is available for 400 minutes out of 480 planned minutes (availability = 83.3%), produces at a rate of 90 pieces per hour instead of the theoretical 100 (performance = 90%), and 95% of the pieces are conforming (quality = 95%), your OEE will be 83.3% × 90% × 95% = 71.2%. How does this figure compare to your current performance?
World-class OEE is generally above 85%, while the industrial average hovers around 60%. Detailed analysis of each OEE component allows you to precisely identify areas requiring improvement. For example, a low availability rate may indicate maintenance or organizational problems, while an insufficient performance rate may reveal rate issues or micro-stoppages. A degraded quality rate will point to process or raw material problems.
The use of OEE as a performance indicator adapts remarkably well to various industrial contexts. In the food industry, where rates are high and sanitary constraints strict, OEE allows quick identification of loss sources related to cleaning or format changes. In the automotive industry, it serves as a central indicator to measure assembly line efficiency and detect bottlenecks. The pharmaceutical sector, with its significant regulatory requirements, uses OEE to balance productive performance and quality compliance.
How are you currently adapting OEE calculation to the specifics of your sector? The most successful companies customize this metric according to their own constraints while maintaining its methodological rigor, thus allowing relevant benchmarks between sites or with industry standards.
Integrating OEE as a central KPI in your production dashboard can truly transform your approach to continuous improvement. Its strength lies in its ability to serve both as a strategic indicator for management and as an operational tool for field teams.
By analyzing your OEE evolution over different periods and comparing it between different production lines or sites, you can identify best practices and the most significant improvement opportunities. OEE then becomes the central engine of your operational excellence approach, whether it's Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, or Total Productive Maintenance (TPM).
Experience shows that just a 10% improvement in OEE can translate into a substantial increase in profitability, often on the order of several margin points. This is why so many industrialists today place OEE at the heart of their performance dashboard.
Labor productivity constitutes our second essential KPI in workshop performance measurement. It measures the efficiency with which your human resources transform inputs into outputs. Its basic formula, Production Volume / Working Hours, may seem elementary, but its application and interpretation vary considerably depending on industrial contexts.
In highly automated environments, this metric focuses more on value added per operator, while in labor-intensive industries, it becomes a crucial indicator of competitiveness. The nuance lies in how you define and measure both production and working hours.
Have you already analyzed whether your productivity calculation method truly reflects the value added by your teams? A sophisticated approach is to distinguish direct productivity (related to value-added operations) from support productivity (related to support functions such as quality, maintenance, or internal logistics), to obtain a more nuanced view of your overall efficiency.
Productivity improvement can take many forms depending on the context. In a machining workshop, optimization might involve implementing a SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) system to drastically reduce tool changeover times. An electronic assembly company might focus on workstation ergonomics and flow design to minimize unnecessary movements. In consumer goods production, implementing workstations balanced according to takt time would align production rhythm with customer demand.
A Quebec manufacturer of automotive components increased its productivity by 25% by redesigning its material flows and training its teams in problem-solving techniques, without major equipment investment. This approach focused on operational efficiency rather than work intensification also reduced absenteeism and improved employee satisfaction.
A fascinating aspect of labor productivity is its close correlation with other KPIs. For example, an improvement in OEE generally leads to increased productivity, but not always in the same proportions. Analysis of these gaps can reveal organizational inefficiencies or line balancing problems.
You've probably already noticed that some teams achieve higher productivity levels with similar equipment. This variation is often explained by human factors such as training, motivation, or work organization – aspects that labor productivity helps highlight.
Improving productivity should never be reduced to simply intensifying work rhythm. The most effective strategies are based on eliminating waste (muda), simplifying tasks, multi-skill training, and involving teams in problem-solving.
Companies that excel in optimizing this KPI are those that adopt a systemic vision, recognizing that productivity is as much a question of intelligent organization as individual effort. They implement suggestion systems, semi-autonomous teams, and evolving work standards that promote continuous improvement by the operators themselves.
What importance do you give to involving your teams in your productivity optimization approach? Experience shows that the most sustainable gains are those based on collective intelligence rather than solutions imposed from above.
The third essential KPI concerns unit production costs. This indicator establishes a direct link between your manufacturing operations and their financial impact. In today's economic environment, characterized by constant pressure on margins, fine control of unit costs becomes a determining competitive advantage.
The structure of production costs has become considerably more complex in recent decades. Beyond traditional direct costs (raw materials, direct labor), it now integrates components such as energy, maintenance, internal logistics expenses, automated equipment depreciation, or non-quality costs. This complexity makes a synthetic metric capable of capturing its global evolution all the more valuable.
Are you able to precisely identify the structure of your unit costs and their main influencing factors? This in-depth knowledge constitutes the essential prerequisite for any effective optimization approach.
The calculation of unit production cost varies according to the accounting methodologies adopted (full cost, direct costing, ABC, etc.), but its fundamental principle remains the same:
The full cost method integrates all expenses, direct and indirect, in the calculation of unit cost. It offers a comprehensive view but can mask certain operational realities. Direct costing (or variable cost) focuses on costs directly proportional to production volume, facilitating break-even analyses. The ABC (Activity-Based Costing) method associates costs with the activities that generate them rather than products, offering a finer understanding of cost drivers.
The most illuminating approach is to segment this KPI into several levels of analysis: by product family, by production line, by period, or by cost component. This segmentation allows you to precisely identify the most impactful improvement levers and avoid hasty conclusions based on misleading averages.
Digital transformation today offers powerful tools for analyzing and optimizing unit costs. Modern ERP systems integrate dedicated modules for calculating cost prices, allowing real-time updating of this critical indicator. Advanced analytics platforms facilitate the identification of correlations between operational parameters and cost evolution.
Intelligent dashboards allow you to visualize cost evolution according to different dimensions and automatically alert in case of drift. These digital tools, combined with a solid methodology, transform unit cost management from a retrospective accounting exercise into proactive management of economic performance.
Does your information system currently allow you to calculate your unit costs with the granularity and frequency necessary for effective management? If not, this could be a priority area for improvement.
Optimization of unit costs does not necessarily mean their systematic reduction. A sophisticated approach is rather to maximize the value created per euro spent. Sometimes, the controlled increase of certain costs (for example in preventive maintenance or training) can lead to an overall reduction in unit cost through improvement of other parameters such as availability or quality.
The best-performing companies in this field establish target costs from the design of products and processes, then deploy methodologies such as kaizen costing to achieve continuous improvement of their cost structure throughout the product lifecycle.
Our fourth essential KPI concerns quality, a fundamental dimension of modern industrial performance. While the "quality" component is already integrated into the OEE calculation, dedicated and in-depth monitoring of conformity indicators proves indispensable for several reasons.
Quality measurement is not limited to the simple rate of conforming products. It extends to more sophisticated metrics such as the cost of non-quality (CNQ), customer complaint rate, PPM (parts per million) of defects, or process capability indicators (Cp, Cpk). Together, these metrics offer a multidimensional view of your quality performance.
Have you developed a quality indicator system that captures both internal aspects (defects detected in production) and external aspects (problems reported by customers)? This dual perspective is essential for measuring the real effectiveness of your quality systems.
The approach to industrial quality generally fits within the framework of recognized standards and certifications that structure approaches and facilitate their evaluation. ISO 9001 establishes the fundamental principles of an effective quality management system. Sector-specific frameworks such as IATF 16949 for automotive, AS/EN 9100 for aerospace, or ISO 13485 for medical devices define specific requirements adapted to the particular challenges of these industries.
These standards are not an end in themselves, but rather a methodological framework that structures the quality approach and facilitates the identification of relevant indicators. They regularly evolve to integrate best practices and address emerging challenges, such as digitalization or eco-design.
Certification according to these frameworks brings not only external recognition but also the opportunity for rigorous evaluation by experienced auditors. It also imposes discipline in monitoring and improving quality indicators, thus contributing to overall operational excellence.
Quality defects generate often underestimated costs that can represent between 5% and 30% of turnover depending on the sector. These costs include scrap, rework, sorting, product recalls, but also hidden costs such as loss of customer confidence, excessive resource mobilization, or missed opportunities.
Beyond the direct financial impact, non-quality durably affects your brand reputation and your ability to retain customers. In a hyperconnected world where information circulates instantly, a major quality problem can compromise years of brand-building efforts.
Do you have a reliable method to evaluate the total cost of non-quality in your organization? This evaluation constitutes a powerful argument to justify investments in process and quality system improvement.
The advent of Industry 4.0 is profoundly transforming the approach to industrial quality. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, advanced industrial vision, or IoT now allow early detection of quality drifts, or even prediction of defects before they appear.
Automated quality control systems coupled with machine learning algorithms can analyze millions of data points in real time to identify patterns invisible to the human eye. Connected sensors allow continuous monitoring of critical process parameters, generating instant alerts in case of drift. Augmented reality facilitates complex controls by guiding operators step by step.
The most successful quality excellence strategies today rely on a combination of proven methods (SPC, FMEA, 8D) and technological innovations. They also integrate the human dimension through the promotion of a strong quality culture where each employee becomes an actor in continuous improvement and where error is seen as a learning opportunity rather than a fault to be sanctioned.
Our fifth strategic KPI concerns meeting delivery deadlines, a factor that has become critical in an economic environment where responsiveness and reliability constitute major competitive advantages. Customer expectations have evolved considerably in recent years, influenced by e-commerce standards and just-in-time methodologies.
The concept of "deadline" itself has become more complex, now encompassing lead time (delay between order and delivery), punctuality (respect of the promised date), flexibility (ability to adapt to schedule changes), and visibility (real-time information on order progress).
How do your customers define their expectations regarding deadlines? This seemingly simple question often hides complex realities that vary according to customer segments, product types, or geographic markets.
To effectively manage your performance in terms of deadlines, several complementary indicators must be regularly monitored. The service rate, which measures the percentage of order lines delivered in accordance with commitments, constitutes the basic indicator. It can be refined by distinguishing delays according to their magnitude or cause.
OTIF (On Time In Full) represents a higher level of requirement, since it only considers complete and punctual deliveries as conforming. Average lead time and its variability give an indication of your reactivity and stability. The stock-out rate measures your ability to maintain product availability.
An effective delivery performance dashboard combines these different indicators and presents them according to several dimensions of analysis: by customer, by product family, by region, by distribution channel. This segmentation allows you to precisely identify areas of underperformance and prioritize improvement actions.
Measurement frequency is also crucial: while monthly monitoring may be sufficient for strategic analyses, effective operational management often requires indicators updated daily, or even in real time for the most critical activities.
Several indicators allow you to measure your performance regarding deadlines. OTIF (On Time In Full) measures the percentage of orders delivered completely and on time. The service rate evaluates your ability to deliver the requested references within the agreed deadlines. Average lead time reflects your overall reactivity, while its variability reveals your operational stability.
These metrics gain relevance when segmented by customer, product family, or region, thus allowing identification of specific issues that might remain masked in a global analysis.
Performance in terms of deadlines is no longer played out solely at the production level, but across the entire supply chain. The most successful companies in this area have moved beyond local optimization to adopt an integrated vision, from supplier to end customer.
This systemic approach involves harmonizing physical and informational flows, deploying methodologies such as S&OP (Sales and Operations Planning), and often implementing advanced technologies such as Advanced Planning Systems (APS) or collaborative platforms. The ultimate goal is no longer just to meet deadlines, but to create a sustainable competitive advantage through an agile and resilient supply chain.
Has your organization taken the step towards integrated supply chain management, or does it still operate in silos? The answer to this question often conditions your ability to achieve excellence in meeting deadlines.
In today's highly competitive manufacturing environment, mastering your factory performance indicators is no longer optional – it has become a sine qua non condition for survival and growth. The five KPIs we have explored form a coherent system that allows you to comprehend your industrial performance in all its essential dimensions.
OEE stands out as the central indicator, the true backbone of your production dashboard, capable on its own of revealing the overall health status of your production apparatus. Combined with labor productivity, unit production costs, quality conformity, and meeting deadlines, it constitutes an ecosystem of indicators that mutually reinforce each other.
The effective integration of these KPIs into your industrial strategy involves several key steps. First, it is essential to precisely define each indicator by adapting it to the specifics of your activity. Next, implementing a reliable and, ideally, automated data collection system ensures the quality and regularity of measurements. Visualizing indicators through dashboards accessible like those offered by Industrial Intelligence at all levels of the organization ensures a shared understanding of performance. Finally, regular animation of improvement rituals around these KPIs transforms measurement into action.
Sign up to follow manufacturing news.